Hello. This is Inishie Destiny from Seito Medical School. From now on, I will be posting rewritten articles from the medical school and articles written in an easy-to-understand way so that even elementary school students can understand them. The theme of this article is authority.
It can be said that it is a basic skill that bigwigs are equipped with. In an article about authority for adults, when you hear the word authority, you imagine a B-grade horror movie with merciless carnage. What is authority? In my opinion, it is a way to control others through fear. Ah, it's scary.
By having military power, an organization such as a nation can prevent terrorist acts such as rebellions. It is easy to control people through fear. However, it can also be said that authority can only sit in its relax chair if it has a minimum level of support.
Authority or support? I think either is fine. When you are unknown at the very beginning, it is difficult to gain support, so you need to be in a position such as a title. However, as you gain positions and experience, you will gradually gain support and trust.
Authority as a position turns into support. Support gives you a bigger position, which leads to more support. If it is beneficial to society, authority will also become like Mito Komon. Can't you see this?!
That being said, there are leaders and managers in the world. Both are management positions, but a leader shows the vision to those around them. A manager's job is to develop human resources and raise the motivation of those around them.
I want my manager to learn words that motivate me so that he can motivate me. What words motivate me? That's it.
In my opinion, leaders and managers have their pros and cons, and I have an image of leaders as strong people. They are the ones who pull others along and give them an opportunity. When a leader shows a vision, it becomes possible for a larger organization to achieve results, rather than just individuals.
Managers are accommodative people, so rather than being cooperative leaders, they can be seen as managers who create cooperative relationships in the workplace. In this case, which of the leader and the manager should be the boss? More specifically, which should have the power?
The only absolute law that is generally correct is that people grow old and die. However, one possible pattern is that a manager whose job is to cooperate with others should act as a stopper for a leader whose job is to achieve results.
The leader can try his hand at flipping the table like the stubborn old men of old, but this means that there needs to be someone to hold the table down at the moment it is flipped.
No, that doesn't make sense. Some people may say that, but the leader is the company's main earner. No matter what others say, a little selfishness is acceptable, but when it's about to develop into a fatal mistake, the power of the top to stop it is needed.
I expect this top authority to be a manager. If the stereotype of a selfish leader is true, then by adjusting the selfish leader, they will be able to make up for the shortcomings of their selfishness and fully demonstrate their abilities.
To sum up, I think it would be good if the leader's main job was to make a lot of money and let the employees have good dreams, and the manager was there to coordinate that. I always think it would be great if there were two people at the top and we could build a relationship where the two tops complement each other.
It may be difficult to find a leader who excels in both managerial coordination and practical skills as a player, but there must be leaders who excel in only one of them. As I have said many times before, this is about managers in a single organization.
It's not a universal story that can be used anywhere, like a goldfish candy. Let's just say that it's just one role pattern. However, if a strong leader and a manager who can coordinate work together, it's like a golden club for a demon.
I would like to see the battle scenes of that game on an LCD screen.
[Article about authority for children]. When you hear authority, you probably imagine a really scary and crappy horror movie. What is authority? In my opinion, it is a way to control the other person through fear. Oh, so scary.
A nation, a group of people, also has weapons to protect itself from attacks by other nations and its own people. It is easy to control people through the fear of weapons and other things.
However, it can also be said that authority can only sit in its relaxing chair if it has the necessary support. Does authority come first, or does it come first to be supported? I think either is fine.
When you first start out as an unknown, it's difficult to gain support, so you need to assume a role or a position. However, as you gain more roles and experience, you will gradually gain support and trust.
The authority of a position changes into support. Support gives a larger role, which in turn leads to more support. If it is beneficial to society, then authority also becomes like Mito Komon. Can't you see this?!
Role → Experience → Support → Mito Komon
That being said, there are leaders and managers in the world. Both have the role of bringing people together, but a leader's job is to talk about the vision to those around them. A manager's job is to develop the people in the company and motivate them.
I want my manager to learn words that motivate me so that I can be motivated. What words motivate me? That's it. For me, leaders and managers have good and bad points, and I have the image that leaders are strong.
A leader is someone who pulls others along and gives them motivation. By showing a vision, a leader can achieve results not just as a single person, but as a larger organization.
A manager's role is to bring people together, so you can see them as creating relationships in the workplace that bring people together. In this case, which should be higher, the leader or the manager? More specifically, which should have the power?
There is no one absolute law that is correct in the world other than that we grow old and die. However, one pattern is that it may be good for managers, whose job is to bring people together, to act as a checkerboard for leaders, whose job is to produce results.
The leader can challenge the others with his special move of flipping the table, like the stubborn old men of old, but this means that there will be someone to hold the table down when it is flipped.
No, that doesn't make sense. Some people may say that, but a leader is someone who increases the company's money. No matter what others say, some selfishness is tolerated, but when it seems like you're heading towards a big mistake, you need a top authority to stop it. I expect this top authority to be a manager.
If this is your idea of a selfish leader, then by bringing the selfish leader together, you will be able to cover up the negative aspects of the selfish part and allow them to fully utilize their abilities.
To summarise what we've discussed so far, I think the leader should be expected to increase the money vigorously and make it their main job to make people at work dream big, with a manager to coordinate this.
I always think it would be great if there were two top people who could create a relationship where they could improve each other. It may be difficult to find a top person who is both excellent at managing as a manager and excellent at playing as a player, but there must be a top person who is outstanding in just one of them.
As I have said many times before, this is a story about how to bring a group of people together. It is not a typical story that can be taken anywhere, like the "Kintaro" candy. Let me just say that it is just one pattern.
However, if a strong leader and a manager who can coordinate things work together, it's like a deadly combination. I'd like to see the battle scenes of that game on my smartphone screen.